The Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR) has changed its name to the New Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science (PHF Science) as of 1 July 2025. The website address is now www.phfscience.nz. Visitors are automatically redirected to the new address. Please check and update any links and bookmarks.
Use our research, insights & resources
Our intelligence hub hosts all our information, from disease surveillance dashboards to environmental risk assessments. Explore and use PHF Science’s research, insights, tools and resources to make a difference for Aotearoa New Zealand.
PHF Science is working to actively co-design with Māori in research, science and innovation to improve Māori economic, social and wellbeing outcomes and impacts.
PHF Science is a New Zealand Government owned research organisation that plays a critical national role in public health and forensics, and is a key contributor to environment and biosecurity outcomes.
Comparative reductions of norovirus, echovirus, adenovirus, Campylobacter jejuni and process indicator organisms during water filtration in alluvial sand
Abstract
Sand filtration is a cost-effective means of reducing microbial pathogens in drinking-water treatment. Our understanding of pathogen removal by sand filtration relies largely on studies of process microbial indicators, and comparative data from pathogens are sparse. In this study, we examined the reductions of norovirus, echovirus, adenovirus, bacteriophage MS2 and PRD1, Campylobacter jejuni, and Escherichia coli during water filtration through alluvial sand. Duplicate experiments were conducted using 2 sand columns (50 cm long, 10 cm diameter) and municipal tap water sourced from chlorine-free untreated groundwater (pH 8.0, 1.47 mM) at filtration rates of 1.1–1.3 m/day. The results were analysed using colloid filtration theory and the HYDRUS-1D 2-site attachment-detachment model. The average log10 reduction values (LRVs) of the normalised dimensionless peak concentrations (Cmax/C0) over 0.5 m were: MS2: 0.28; E. coli: 0.76; C. jejuni: 0.78; PRD1: 2.00; echovirus: 2.20; norovirus: 2.35; and adenovirus: 2.79. The relative reductions largely corresponded to the organisms' isoelectric points rather than their particle sizes or hydrophobicities. MS2 underestimated virus reductions by 1.7–2.5 log, and the LRVs, mass recoveries relative to bromide, collision efficiencies, and attachment and detachment rates differed mostly by ∼1 order of magnitude. Conversely, PRD1 reductions were comparable with those of all 3 viruses tested, and its parameter values were mostly within the same orders of magnitude. E. coli seemed an adequate process indicator for C. jejuni with similar reductions. Comparative data describing pathogen and indicator reductions in alluvial sand have important implications for sand filter design, risk assessments of drinking-water supplies from riverbank filtration and the determination of safe setback distances for drinking-water supply wells.
